Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialists Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet

Right to be forotten solicitors

Law Society Awards winners. Cohen Davis

What our clients say...
"...always delivers significantly above average with outstanding results...”
"Yair's approach to business is truly unique and refreshing. His dedication to business... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.


Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

Defamation by an Ex-Employee

Defamation by employee

Defamation by an ex-employee. What can I do about it?

It is not uncommon for disgruntled former employees to go on a campaign of defamation against their former employer’s company.

The defamation normally occurs through blogs, emails and by initiation of discussion groups in forums aimed at throwing as much dirt as possible at the former employee's company.

 

Occasionally, the defamatory work results from a collaboration of disgruntled individuals who decide to participate in the negative campaign.

It is frightening to know how easy it is for former employees to spread defamation on the internet and ruin their former employer's company.

More often than not, the disgruntled former employees who start defamation campaigns keep their identity hidden from the public, posting their defamatory comments anonymously.

Sometimes they use false identities to post their comments and emails, and to purchase internet services to promote their hate campaign. What they fail to realise is that their proactive attempts to conceal their true identities can be viewed as dishonest by a court, and might substantially diminish the credibility of allegations they may make during any subsequent legal proceedings.

After all, it is only sensible to conclude that the reason for using false personal details to make serious allegations against someone is to prevent these allegations from being fairly evaluated.

Dishonest behaviour is not encouraged by our legal system.

A good illustration is the 2001 decision of the High Court in the case of Takenaka (UK) and Corfe v David Frankl, which is still good law.

In that case, the High Court in London was tasked with protecting the reputation of a company, Takenaka UK Ltd, against the spread of lies against it by a disgruntled ex-employee.

At the conclusion of the proceedings, the ex-employee, David Frankl, was ordered to pay £26,000 damages as well as Takenaka’s legal costs of over £100,000.

His Honour Judge Alliott, sitting at the High Court in London, ruled that defamatory emails were sent by Frankl, using a false name, regarding his ex-employer.

In a series of emails that aimed to cause damage to Takenaka’s reputation, Mr Frankl (who was using the name of Christina Realtor) accused the company of hypocrisy, double standards and callousness.

He didn't get away with it, but that hasn't stopped other former employees from engaging in similar campaigns.

Related Article

Injunction against former employee posing online

9 Steps to Avoid Defamation by Former Employees

Defamation by an Ex-Employee

Is it illegal to post fake online reviews?

Defamation on a Review Website

Pin It
Explore this topic!
Our work featured on

    Internet defamation lawguardian remove images from the internet Amazon specialist lawyer

online defamation legal advice

Competitors defamation
Cease and Desist letter
Internet Law Blog
How to make a successful right to be forgotten application
On 12 October 2014, Google reported to have rejected more than two thirds of all the ‘right to be forgotten’ applications... Read More...
How to turn online reputation crisis into a marketing opportunity
Company directors often prefer to remove damaging webpages from public sight by using a discrete method to push the derogatory... Read More...
Remove search results from Google worldwide
Right to be forgotten. Does Google delist search results from Google searches worldwide or only from European Google searches? ... Read More...
Liability of website operators UK