Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

DEFAMATION LEGAL ADVICE FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet

Law Society Awards winners. Cohen Davis

What our clients say...
"Innovative Approach Most Refreshing"
“Yair is an impressive individual who really understands the needs of his clients. His... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.


Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outsite the UK.

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

TheInternet LawCentre

Defamation by investors solicitor - large companies

Company defamation solicitors

Meet Gary. Gary was a small investor in listed public companies who held shares in a gold mining company RRR PLC. As an active investor, Gary used to be involved in online investment forums such as Interactive Investors.

For reasons only known to him, one day, Gary started to post defamatory posts about the company on a number of online investors’ forums. He also promoted his defamatory posts and speculative rumours via Twitter.

 

Over a number of weeks, Gary posted dozens of defamatory posts about the company, some of which created heated discussions about the accuracy and truthfulness of the posts, which was presumably what he had set out to do. After a while, Gary’s defamation against the company started to appear on the first page of Google search results. Even though he was a very small investor in a large gold mining company, the intensity of his comments was so high that some investors started to believe that the defamatory posts were actually true. This resulted in a decline in investment in the company and in a sharp reduction in the value of its shares.

Initially, the company took no action in relation to the defamation because the Board of Directors were yet to appreciate the potentially disproportionate damage that one small investor could cause a large PLC by posting defamatory comments on the internet. However, after they received numerous worrying messages from concerned investors, they were resolved to take action to save the company’s reputation.

It was important for the company to act immediately, yet delicately, due to the potential additional reputational damage that legal action against an investor could have caused. The company therefore chose Cohen Davis to handle the matter. Mainly, they chose us because of the unique and creative approach we take to handling online defamation matters of this nature and the due consideration and advice we give our clients in relation to reputational risks and reputational outcomes.

In these sorts of cases there is likely to be additional media interest, which needed to be handled delicately in order to protect the reputation of the company and to avoid negative publicity which could potentially result in a further decline in share prices. Eventually, we had no choice but to issue defamation proceedings against Gary in order to protect the investment of thousands of investors.

Gary accepted that all his allegations were unfounded, apologised and agreed to pay compensation which the company’s Chairman donated to a charitable cause. The lessons of this case to a company that suffers defamation on the internet are numerous: First, it is clear that a single investor can cause a huge amount of reputational and financial damage, even to a PLC, by posting untrue stories and unfounded speculations on the internet. Second, a PLC, despite its size, might become vulnerable to online defamation as much as a small, private limited company.

Third, the influence of online investment forums on individual and corporate investors must never be underestimated by companies of any size. Fourth, the cost of online defamation to a large, public company is likely to be far higher than it is to a small private company because it has much more to lose. And finally, the company’s board in this case did the right thing by instructing a niche law firm that specialises in online defamation and reputational law to handle this matter promptly and delicately from all angles.

An apology 

Pin It
Online harassment injunction - case study
Our work featured on

    Internet defamation lawguardian remove images from the internet Amazon specialist lawyer

Our clients speak out
"...always delivers significantly above average with...
"Yair's approach to business is truly unique and refreshing. His dedication to business... Read More...
"More than I bargained for..."
“I have had a good consultation with Cohen Davis solicitors. I was pleasantly surprised... Read More...
"...understanding the issue straight away...”
"Professional and understanding the issue straight away. Very good service.” I. Khan... Read More...
"...we value your straight talk..."
"You have been acting as our attorneys in the UK for over 10 years. We value your... Read More...
"I was retaining their services all the way from the USA"
“I was directed to the Cohen Davis Team from another lawyer who stated that he had seen... Read More...
"My mind was totally at rest when I emerged from Yair's...
"I received advice from Yair Cohen about a matter involving a very devious person who was... Read More...

online defamation legal advice

Internet Law Blog
Online Defamation on YouTube
Online reputation attacks can be significantly more powerful when videos are used to attack someone’s reputation. Google,... Read More...
Fake online reviews
It is estimated by researchers that between 16 to 20 per cent of social media reviews are fake. We believe however that the real... Read More...
How to turn online reputation crisis into a marketing opportunity
Company directors often prefer to remove damaging webpages from public sight by using a discrete method to push the derogatory... Read More...
Liability of website operators UK