Remove defamation from the internet solicitors

Jurisdiction: United States 

Remove reviews from Pissed Consumer

Date of removal: 22 April 2022.

Number of reviews deleted: 3

Additional information: Our client was a UK citizen and a financial advisor. After nearly 6 years of having defamation posted about him on the Navada based website PissedConsumer.com, he instructed our firm on the matter. We have obtained an injunction in the High Court as well as an court order under Section 13 of the Defamation Act. We served the court order on the operator of PissedConsumer on the USA who agreed to delete the defamatory posts on the basis of the court order from the English Court. 

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: Facebook

Date of removal: 05 May 2019.

Number of Facebook Pages deleted: 1

Additional information: Our client was President of the Regional State of an African country. A group of people had created a fake Facebook Page that gave the impression that it belongs to the President. The fraudulent Facebook Page was using images of the President and was being used to make personal and political comments in relation to the President and the Region which were falsely attributed to the President. The genuine Facebook Page states that it was an Official Government Page whereas the fraudulent Facebook Page only claimed to be a “Community Page”. Whilst the official President Facebook Page had over 300,000 followers, the fraudulent Page had approximately 17,000. Nonetheless, both the President and Government were concerned that the fraudulent Facebook Page was provoking national unrest by spreading fake news. They were concerned that the fake Facebook Page was gathering momentum fast. Our expert social media lawyers used an existing contact with Facebook to quickly explain the complex situation. Facebook agreed to delete the fake Facebook Page whilst our client agreed to not persist with his disclosure order application aiming to disclosure the identity of the people behind the fake Facebook Page.

Jurisdiction: United States 

Articles removed from: Google search

Date of removal: 18 December 2018

Number of news articles removed: 2

Our client complained about news articles which related to a criminal prosecution in 2000 which resulted in the applicant being found not guilty. The main witness in his case had admitted in court that she had been lying in her evidence.

The new paper articles described the main witness’ evidence at court, evidence which turned out to be false. The article created a false impression that our client was a sexual predator. Our solicitors made a successful application to Google to remove links to the news article on the basis that the data contained about our client in the news articles was inaccurate and had a disproportionately negative impact on our client, breaching his right to be considered innocent, and his right to private life. There was no public interest in the continued publication.   

Jurisdiction: United States 

Articles removed from: Free Library 

Date of removal: 11 November 2018

Number of news articles removed: 1

Our client complained about news articles which related to a criminal prosecution. Having secured removal of the news articles from the original newspaper website, our client required the removal from TheFreeLibrary.com. This was achieved by a right to be forgotten application to Google.   

Jurisdiction: United States 

Articles removed from: Google searches

Date of removal: 08 November 2018

Number of news articles removed: 4

Our client was convicted in 2009 for a serious public order offence, involving a touching another person in a manner which the victim considered sexual.

He received a community punishment order and was placed on the sex offenders register for a period of 3 years. In 2018, with his conviction considered as spent, he had made an application to Google to remove a news articles which appeared on the DailyRecord.com. Google refused, citing the serious nature of the offence. Our right to be forgotten lawyers prepared a second right to be forgotten to Google.

Swiftly, Google agreed to the de-listing of the news articles which related to the previous conviction. However, despite this, it appeared that Google online de-listed two out of three news articles. The most serious one remained accessible through Google search.

After further discussions with Google, Google de-listed all the news articles from Google.co.uk, but only from the English version. It took further communications between our right to be forgotten lawyers and Google before Google completely de-listed the entire list of news articles concerning our client’s previous conviction.

We highly recommend that when contacting Cohen Davis about a right to be forgotten applications, you ask for a fixed fee. A fixed fee would usually cover all the work done on your matter as it could varied from case to case.  

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: Facebook

Date of removal: 06 January 2018.

Number of Facebook Pages deleted: 1

Additional information: Our client was a politician who had a fake Facebook Page created to his name. The fake Facebook Page was visually similar to the Facebook Page of our client and included images of our client. Whoever created the similar fake Facebook Page had given the initial impression that the Facebook Page belonged to our politician client. The fake Page which also contained images of our client was used to attack our client personally with personal and political comments which were wrongly attributed to our client. First, our client’s office wrote to Facebook asking to remove the fake Facebook Page but Facebook declined the request, claiming that there was public interest in retaining the Page. Our social media lawyers communicated with Facebook to reject Facebook reasons for refusing to delete the fake Facebook Page. They rely on an established legal principle that there is never public interest in fake information. They also asserted the our client’s privacy rights, the rights of Facebook users to be presented with content which isn’t highly manipulated, Facebook own terms of business and other legal rights, including intellectual property rights. Facebook then permanently deleted the fake Facebook Page.

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: GlassDoor.co.uk

Date of removal: 13 November 2017.

Number of reviews removed: 1

Additional information: This removal relates to a defamatory review posted on GlassDoor.co.uk by anonymous GlassDoor user. The GlassDoor review was false as it alleged that the company’s CEO was conducting himself in a manner which would put most employees off applying for jobs and which would result in suppliers and business associates wondering whether they should do business with the company at all. In this case we negotiated the removal of the review from GlassDoor after communicating with GlassDoor legal department. This resulted in a considerable sense if relief to our clients, both the company and the CEO and in the saving on great deal of money to them as on his occasion GlassDoor agreed to remove the review before we had to resort to litigation.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom 

Review removed from: Google search results

Date of removal: 4 September 2017

Number of pages removed: 5

Additional information: Our client was in the public eye when he faced a trial for serious allegations. He was found not guilty of all charges but the publicity around his trial kept causing him reputational damage and substantial distress, to him and to his family. After Google declined to de-list links to the news articles which contained information about the trial, our lawyers successfully appealed that decision to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) under the right to be forgotten to request that the ICO tells Google to de-list those articles in relation to our client's name. The ICO determined that our client’s right to private life outweighed the public interest in the matter and our client having been found not guilty by a court of law, had had a right to have the matter forgotten by the general public. The ICO ordered Google to de-list the links within 28 days.  

Jurisdiction: United States 

Reviews removed from: Google Business listings

Date of removal: 15 June 2017

Number of reviews removed: 5

Additional information: Our client is a dental practice with several dental clinics across London. Over a brief period of time our client's Google listings of one of its dental practices has been subjected to 5 highly negative Google reviews. The dental practice was unable to trace any individuals with the names given by the Google uses who posted the online reviews so our lawyers obtained a court order, permitting Google to disclose to us information and data which Google had collected in relation to each of the Google users who posted a defamatory review about our client’s dental clinic. The disclosure from Google revealed that none of the Google reviewers were ever a patient of our client's dental clinic. This information helped us to facilitate the removal of the reviews from Google Maps (Business) listings in relation to our client's dental clinic. .   

Jurisdiction: United Kindgdom.

Pages removed from: Yell.com

Date of removal: 17 May 2017

Number of defamatory reviews removed: 2 

Additional information: Our client owns a successful dental practice in London. The dental surgery was subjected to 2 fake online reviews on Yell.com causing it substantial reputational damage. Dentists and dental surgeries are particularly susceptible to fake online reviews. Having communicated with Yell.com the operators of the website agreed to have the defamatory reviews against the dental surgery removed from the internet..

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom 

Pages removed from: WordPress

Date of removal: 08 May 2017

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client, a successful mining company incorporated in Australia, was defamed on the internet. A website was published, containing highly defamatory articles with the intent of causing our client as much damage as possible. However, the website creators’ identities remained hidden, by a VPN service HidemyAss.com, allowing the campaign of defamation anonymously against our client. Our defamation and harassment solicitors successfully obtained a Norwich Pharmacal Order (NPO) against the parent company of HidemyAss.com, Privax Limited, which in turn provided the identification of the users through their IP addresses. 

Jurisdiction: United States 

Review removed from: Google Maps

Date of removal: 02 May 2017

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client is a small company that like many in the UK is relying on Google searches to acquire new customers. After our client increase their prices, one of their customers tried to negotiate a discount. When this was refused, the customer went on Google Maps to post a highly defamatory review against the company. This resulted in substantial financial losses to our client’s business because the false review was detailed and highly convincing to the unsuspected Google user. Following communication with the Google user, the user removed the false review from Google Maps and our client received an apology. Our client's Google Maps listing are now clean and healthy and our client is reporting that business is back to normal.  

Jurisdiction: United States 

Review removed from: MoneySavingExert.co.uk

Date of removal: 09 February 2017

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client is a successful director of a small business installing driveways and patios and was subjected to defamation on the internet. The defamation included the creation of a forum where comments were posted with the aim of damaging the business’ reputation. As well as a poor Google review leaving no explanation. The defamatory posts appeared prominently on Google search results and were ultimately causing a loss in the number of new customers. Our specialist team of internet lawyers successfully facilitated the removal of the defamatory material from www.MoneySavingExpert.co.uk and from Google search results.  

Jurisdiction: United States 

Review removed from: Yell.com

Date of removal: 20 December 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information:Our defamation solicitors removed highly defamatory reviews posted on Yell.com on behalf of our client, a successful business owner who owned a national plumbing business and was relying on reviewing new leads through Google searches. A competitor posted fake reviews on Yell. The fake review had caused substantial loss of revenue as they were within the first page of Google when searching the client’s business. Our lawyers communicated with Yell to request that they remove the false review from Yell website. The review was removed without the need to issue future legal proceedings.  

Jurisdiction: United Kindgdom.

Pages removed from: Google searches (The Free Library)

Date of removal: 17 November 2016.

Number of search results: 1 

Additional information:Our client is a successful businessman with business interests across the globe. The offending search result related to an incident which took place over 15 years ago and which was the fifth natural Google search result for our client’s name. Our privacy solicitors communicated with Google in accordance with the “right to be forgotten” and successfully facilitated the removal of the article from search results across Europe and the USA.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: PistonHeads forum

Date of removal: 15 November 2016

Number of pages removed: 1 post

Additional information: Our client was exposed to a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. Internet users who would Google the client’s company would be linked to a forum including highly defamatory adjectives. Despite the fact that the client was only mentioned in passing, the association with the website caused reputation damage to the business as well as an unquantifiable level of financial damage. Our specialist solicitors successfully made contact with the forum operators and made a request under Section 10 Data Protection Act to have the post removed which it was.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom 

Review removed from: Google search results (Skegness Standard)

Date of removal: 15 September 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client is a highly successful businessman. The client had previously applied to Google to have an article removed from its search results however this was refused. Our specialist internet law and social media lawyers made an application to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) in accordance with the “right to be forgotten” to request that the ICO exercises its power to order Google to remove search results featuring the article from the Skegness Standard, as the it was among the first Google search results for searches under our client’s name. The ICO considered the effect of the continued publication of the article on our client against the public interest in having access to it. The ICO determined that our client’s privacy outweighed the public interest and ordered Google to remove the result within 28 days.  

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: www.dailymail.co.uk

Date of removal: 28 June 2016

Number of web pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client was a successful, well known medical practitioner from New York. Our privacy lawyers were tasked with the removal of private information from a Daily Mail article concerning our USA based client. The private information included references to our client’s intimate activities as a private individual, references to his work as a doctor and other personal information including his name, place of practice and an image of his face. The publication in the Daily Mail had a detrimental impact on our client, including on his income. Our privacy lawyers succeeded in negotiating substantial amendments to the Daily Mail article including the removal of our client's name and photograph so that he could no longer be identified. We successfully argued that UK privacy laws should equally apply to an American Citizen. Our privacy lawyers resolved the matter without the need for our client to commence litigation.  

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: www.HarringayOnline.com

Date of removal: 8 June 2016

Number of web pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client, a party wall surveyor, was subjected to a campaign of harassment on the internet. The campaign included posting of defamatory comments that intended to harm his business. The posters falsely accused him of being dishonest and this naturally resulted in loss of revenue. The defamatory posts against our client and against his business appeared on the first page of Google search results and this caused him substantial distress. Initially, the website operators of HarringayOnline refused our client's request to remove the defamatory posts but once our defamation lawyers stepped in the matter was successfully resolved to his satisfaction.  

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: RipOffReport.com

Date of removal: 6 June 2016

Number of pages removed: 5

Additional information: Our client was located in the USA but had substantial business interests in the United Kingdom. First, our client with the help of our US internet law attorneys obtained an injunction in the US to prevent the publication of the defamation on RipOffReport, enforcing the injunction in relation to the false RipOffReport on Google. However, Google insisted that as our client's injunction was obtained in the USA, Google was not obliged to honour it in relation to its Google search engines across the EU.

Our client, who has business interests across the globe fought Google for more than 12 months until our defamation lawyers managed to persuade Google's lawyers to de-list the defamatory RipOffReport from searches across the European Union.

Eventually we de-listed a total of 5 RipOffReport pages from Google searches results across the EU. We strongly recommend that you instruct a solicitor to deal with the removal of defamation on RipOffReport from search engines and that you do not attempt to do this yourself. If you require an injunction, our lawyers will work out with you the best jurisdiction for your case to obtain it and if required will work together with our US internet law attorneys whose offices are located just outside the courthouse in Tempe, Arizona.  

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: WordPress

Date of removal: 20 May 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client, a successful dairy farmer became victim of defamation by a disgruntled ex-employee who created a blog on WordPress defaming our client by falsely claiming he was being abused as an employee. The ex-employee commenced legal proceedings against our client in an employment tribunal which in the meantime were dismissed for lack of merits. The ex-employee used the defamatory WordPress blog to try and blackmail our client. He demanded thousands of pounds in return for the deletion of the blog. Our defamation lawyers advised our client not to pay and made him and the ex-employee aware of anti-bribery laws. Our defamation lawyers took swift action to facilitate the removal of the defamatory blog and to quickly stop the reputational damage it was causing our client. . 

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: Twitter

Date of removal: 20 May 2016

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client became victim of blackmail on the internet which was carried out on social media by a number of individuals. Our defamation lawyers took swift action to close down a defamatory Twitter account because it was used to defame and spread false allegations against our client.  

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: Amazon, Amazon.co.uk

Date of removal: 6 May 2016

Number of web pages removed: 14 sellers suspended

Additional information: We acted for a major electrical manufacturer and their UK sole distributors to facilitate the removal of fake, counterfeit and compatible items from Amazon sale. Our clients had in excess of 20 items being sold on Amazon as compatible, which resulted in losses of large volume of sales. Additionally we removed from Amazon sellers who used our clients’ copyright and trademarked images to sell alternative yet similar products to the original goods. . 

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: Amazon, Amazon.co.uk

Date of removal: 6 May 2016

Number of web pages removed: 14 sellers suspended

Additional information: We acted for an electrical designer and manufacturer to facilitate the removal of fake, counterfeit and compatible items from Google Shopping. Our lawyers successfully removed 8 sellers from Google Shopping after they identify the sales of fake and compatible goods on Google Shopping in breach of our clients’ trademark.  

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: Google searches (The Bury Times)

Date of removal: 19 April 2016

Number of web pages removed:1

Additional information: Our client was falsely accused of a sexual offence and acquitted many years ago. However, an ongoing publication on the topic continued to have an enormously detrimental effect on our client's life. Our privacy solicitors successfully communicated with Google and facilitated the removal of an article from search results, which had previously appeared as the second natural search result on searching our client’s name.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: nuisancecalls.org.uk

Date of removal: 7 April 2016

Number of web pages removed: 20+

Additional information: Our defamation and harassment solicitors successfully liaised with the website operators to secure the removal of numerous posts which were targetting our client and tarnishing their good reputation. These harassing posts were having a harsh financial effect on business and our client was hugely relieved to have the posts removed.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: Google searches (Daily Mirror)

Date of removal: 23 March 2016

Number of web pages removed:1

Additional information: Our right to be forgotten lawyers made an application to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) under a right to be forgotten with a request that the ICO orders Google to remove search results featuring the Daily Record news article as the article had made extensive references to our client. The ICO considered that our clients’ ability to obtain employment, which was made difficult by the news article outweighed the public interest in the information remaining available via search results. The ICO therefore considered that the information featuring was no longer relevant and it ordered Google remove the result within 28 days.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom, United States

Pages removed from: Google searches (Google+)

Date of removal: 9 February 2016

Number of web pages removed: 1

Additional information: Our client believed he was having an intimate chat with a female he met on a dating website. Eventually he fell victim to internet blackmail and revenge porn. The user had captured an intimate video of our client in compromising positions and published it online together with personal identifying information. The user had created a number of Google + accounts under our client's name and used those to publish and link to the intimate video. The video and the derogatory captures about our client were appearing visibly on Google searches. Our solicitors successfully communicated with Google Inc to ensure the removal of the videos from the internet and the deletion of the Google + accounts and any other Google searches that included private information about our client. 

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom

Pages removed from: Google and Google+

Date of removal: 11 December 2015

Number of web pages removed: 2

Additional information: Our defamation lawyers acted for a national motor repair company. A disgruntled customer defamed our client’s company on the internet and said he would only agree to remove the defamation from Google + Google reviews should our client comply with his unreasonable demands. Our lawyers communicated with the author of the review to ensure removal without the need for legal proceedings. Our client was relieved to have their clean internet reputation restored. Our lawyers recommend to business owners to never agree to be blackmailed in return for removal of a defamatory review from the internet as this tends to invite further defamation and is a far less effective was to deal with online defamation than to make a statement that your company is not willing to tolerate unfair reviews or be blackmailed in return for removal of reviews from the internet. Our defamation lawyers are highly experienced in dealing with customers’ reviews and will help you resolve and overcome any dispute that demonstrates itself in negative online reviews.

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: WorldObserverOnline.com

Date of removal: 3 November 2015.

Number of pages removed: 1

Additional information: An article online was negatively impacting our client's employment and future employment prospects. It focused on criticising our client for actions she took on behalf of her previous employer having followed instructions. Consequently the article was both misleading and inaccurate. The publication was causing hugely disproportionate damage to our client, both financially and psychologically. Our data protection and internet lawyers successfully facilitated the removal of the article for our client, allowing our client to progress their career unimpeded.

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: Google

Date of removal: 26 October 2015

Number of pages removed: 2

Additional information: Our client, a professional self-employed person, was subjected to a campaign of defamation and harassment on the internet. The campaign was carried out by competitors who spread lies about our client and about his business on the internet, including on Google business reviews. To remove Google business reviews our business defamation solicitors used their experience and understanding of Google's own terms and conditions and having wrote to Google's attorneys they had all the fake business reviews against our client removed from Google + and Google maps.

Jurisdiction: United States 

Pages removed from: Google Plus

Date of removal: 20 October 2015

Number of pages removed: 2 

Additional information: Our client, a professional person and a sole trader, was subjected to a campaign of online defamation, possible by competitors who were trying to ruin his business. The campaign included defamatory reviews on Google, describing our client as dishonest and his serivice as shoddy. He was described as fraud, scam and a liar. This caused him huge financial losses and the near collapse on his business. Our defamation lawyers successfully facilitated the removal of the defamatory business reviews from Google Plus.

Jurisdiction: United States, 

Pages removed from: Google reviews

Date of removal: 2 October 2015.

Number of pages removed: 2 reviews.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a 2 highly defamatory reviews from Google reviews (Google Plus) by communicating with Google. No legal action was required. The reviews were removed on behalf of a national estate agent company.  

Jurisdiction: United States, 

Pages removed from: Blogger

Date of removal: 25 September 2015.

Number of pages removed: 1 post and 4 images.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed a post and 5 highly defamatory comments as well as images of our client from a Blogger based website. The defamation was removed by the blogger following negotiations with our defamation solicitors without our client having to initiate formal legal proceedings. 

Jurisdiction: United State, California

Pages removed from: Google searches

Date of removal: 07 October 2015

Number of search results removed from Google: 2

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 2 search results from Google searches in relation to 14 search phrases. 

Jurisdiction: United States.
Pages removed from: DildoofTheDay

Date of removal: 27 June 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our privacy lawyers facilitated removal of private information from DildofTheDay website. Private and sensitive information concerning our client was posted, without his knowledge or consent as part of a campaign of harassment against him. 

Jurisdiction: United Kingdon.
Pages removed from: VivaStreet.co.uk

Date of removal: 26 June 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our solicitors made an application to the website operators to remove sensitive private information from VivaStreet.co.uk. The private information about our client, a UK based corporate recovery and business turnaround specialist, was posted without his permission and resulted in him receiving unsolicited telephone calls and SMS messages from users of the VivaStreet.co.uk. Our privacy lawyers communicated with the website operators and successfully removed all the personal information from the website's database.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: instagram.

Date of removal: 04 June 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 75+.

Additional information: In this case our client, who works in the entertainment industry suffered harassment and abuse on Instagram. We obtained an injunction to stop the abusers from sending our client abusive Instagram messages and images. The injunction was served via Instagram on the users before Instagram agreed to disclose their details to help us identify them as UK based internet trolls. 

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 21 May 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed reviews from Blogger as well as remove unlawfully obtained image of our client. The allegations on Blogger were highly defamatory suggesting our client was involved in deception and identity theft. Our client suffered financial loss as a direct result of the publication. The defamatory Blog was deleted from the internet.    

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Google searches

Date of removal: 20 April 2015.

Number of search results: 2 

Additional information: Our privacy solicitors successfully communicated with Google and facilitated the removal of images of our client from search results. The images no longer appeared on Google searches.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Law Society Gazette.

Date of removal: 26 February 2015.

Number of web pages removed: 12.

Additional information: Our solicitors removed from the Law Society Gazette user comments which were posted in response to an editorial article. The defamatory comments referred to our client, a Kent lawyer and attributed to her poor customer service. Some of the comments that our lawyers removed referred to an investigation by the SRA of our client, even though that investigation never resulted in disciplinary action against her. We made representations to the editors that publishing facts about an investigation which resulted in nothing was defamatory of our client. 

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Google searches

Date of removal: 09 December 2014.

Number of search results removed from Google: 2.

Additional information: We applied to Google for Right to be forgotten. Our client was the victim of a criminal campaign of stalking and harassment which had a sever mental affect on her and the family. The online blog appeared in searches for our clients name. Our solicitors made the application under the European right to be forgotten. Our solicitors successfully removed the offending and harassing online blog and related harassing searches of our clients name from Google.

Jurisdiction: United State, Maryland.

Pages removed from: Outofthedark.com

Date of removal: 23 September 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 6 posts from this website. Under a right to be forgotten. In this project our social media lawyers removed from UK and European Google search results references to defamatory posts to our client on the American website. Links to the defamatory web pages were removed following representations by our social media lawyers to Google that they breached our client's human rights and UK data protection laws. This was an appeal after our client's own attempt to require Google to remove links to the defamatory web page under the Right to Be Forgotten, using Google own standard form failed.   

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Google blogger

Date of removal: 29 August 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 5.

Additional information: Remove blogger's blog from the internet with 5 posts and comments following initiation of legal proceedings against Google.  

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Money Saving Expert.

Date of removal: 14 July 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: 1 offending thread deleted.

Jurisdiction: United State, Arizona.

Pages removed from: Google search de-index.

Date of removal: 26 September 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 3.

Additional information: Google de-index pages from search results worldwide. 

Location: United State, California.

Pages removed from: ebay.

Date of removal: 24 October 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: 2 negative feedback removed.

Location: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: ReviewCentre.

Date of removal: 19 November 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 6.

Additional information: 1 thread deleted. Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of a defamatory thread from ReviewCentre. The defamatory thread had caused substantial amount of financial damage to our clients, a leading national property management agency. 

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 27 January.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: 2 Google Local reviews deleted. 1 Google Plus fake account deleted.

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Google Autocomplete/Google search.

Date of removal: 17 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: Our defamation lawyers removed 10 search phrase from Google Autocomplete. 13 Additional offending web pages de-indexed from Google searches. The autocomplete referred internet users to defamatory search results against our client, a prominent academic. Google agreed to delete the search suggestions shortly after we commenced legal proceedings against Google for harassment.  

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 24 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors persuaded Google to delete 2 blog post from Blooger which is operated by Gooogle. 

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Automattic WoredPress.com.

Date of removal: 31 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: Part of 1 thread deleted. Our defamation solicitors removed defamatory comments which were posted on WordPress in relation to our client's international property letting business. 

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Property Tribes.

Date of removal: 03 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 10+.

Additional information: 1 defamatory thread. Our defamation solicitors assisted in the removal of a thread of defamatory posts against our client, an international property agent. This was achieved through communication with the website operator and without the need for litigation.

Jurisdiction: United State, Virginia.

Pages removed from: IPetitions. Tigger LLC.

Date of removal: 04 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Removed 1 petition + 9 comments.  

Jurisdiction: Belgium.

Pages removed from: Rare nyheter.

Date of removal: 9 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 50+.

Additional information: 1 thread. Our client was a target of a campaign of harassment of defamation on this website. Our defamation solicitors removed the defamation without having to issue actual legal proceedings.  

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Blogger.

Date of removal: 14 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Removed 1 post + 3 live links by application of our defamation solicitors to Google .  

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Money Saving Expert.

Date of removal: 24 March 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 50+.

Additional information: 2 offending threads of reviews against a hotel were deleted. Our defamation solicitors facilitated the removal of 2 defamatory threads which contained dozens of defamatory comments against our client, who is the owner of a chain of hotels in the UK. The reviews agains the hotel were posted by a group guests who first demanded discounts to their hotel bills with no justification for their demand. 

Jurisdiction: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Google search engine. Website: econjob rumors.com

Date of removal: 17 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 20+.

Additional information: A right to be forgotten. Private and defamatory information removed from website and from Google search engine worldwide.

Jurisdiction: Canada.

Pages removed from: Vertical Scope.

Date of removal: 28 April 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: 1 comment deleted. Our defamation solicitors removed a highly defamatory thread from this website which operated by Vertical Scope in Canada. The defamation removed was in relation to our client's business as a national dog breeder. 

Location: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Facebook.

Date of removal: 1 May 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: Our defamation solicitors removed 1 defamatory Facebook Page together with history and referring links from various Facebook accounts on behalf of our client, who works in the entertainment industry and who suffered for many months from defamation on Facebook. 

Location: United State, California.

Pages removed from: Facebook.

Date of removal: 12 May 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: 1 Facebook Page deleted + history and referring links. Facebook Page deleted on grounds of allleged breaches of trademark.

Jurisdiction: United State, Arizona.

Pages removed from: Google search engine. Website: cult education.com

Date of removal: 16 May 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 50+

Additional information: A right to be forgotten. Private and defamatory information removed from Google search engine worldwide.

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: City Wire.co.uk.

Date of removal: 26 May 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: 

Jurisdiction: United State, Czech Republic.

Pages removed from: Places in UK.net

Date of removal: 24 January 2014.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: 1 review deleted.

Jurisdiction: United State, Arizona.

Pages removed from: Rip Off Report.

Date of removal: 23 October 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 2.

Additional information: Removed defamation from RipOffReport. Obtained disclosure orders and identified poster who was subsequently arrested, prosecuted and convicted at Iselworth Crown Court. We have obtained disclosure orders, compelling RipOffReport to provide IP addresses and other identifying information about posters of defamation on RipOffReport, who attempted to ruin our client’s business. Lawyers at our associated office in Arizona were able to obtain the court orders within days of our instructions. 

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: National College of Teaching and Leadership

Date of removal: 19 September 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 1.

Additional information: In this project we represented a school teacher and successfully removed from the internet extracts from the detailed decision of UK's teacher's disciplinary tribunal,  the National College of Teaching and Leadership. The decision to remove the information from the National College of Teaching and Leadership was taken following representations that the information contained thereof placed the teacher at risk of physical violence. 

Jurisdiction: United Kingdom.

Pages removed from: Interactive Investor

Date of removal: 19 October 2013.

Number of web pages removed: 6.

Additional information: In this project our internet and social media lawyers represented a global gold mining company that became to subject of defamation by a disgruntled shareholder who posted false allegations about the company and its chairman. Initially the PLC responded to the defamatory allegations on the forum but very quickly its board felt that this was only increasing the visibility of the defamation on search results. Some shareholders who viewed the poisonous forum comments started to sell their shares, which became almost worthless. Following our social media solicitor's intervention the posts were removed and the culprit was force to issue an apology. At the same time, our lawyers cleared the internet of dozens of other defamatory posts from other investors forums. The company's shares recovered almost immediately after.