
Privacy cases: breach of privacy and misuse of private information
By Yair Cohen, Solicitor specialising in internet law
These are privacy cases in which Cohen Davis acted for the person whose private information had been exposed online, or was about to be. They include claims for misuse of private information and breach of confidence, injunctions with anonymity orders against named defendants and against persons unknown, and the removal of intimate images and private details from websites and search results. Each case study sets out what happened, the legal route we chose and how the matter ended.
What follows is a selection of our privacy work. Many of our cases never reach a public hearing, and judges publish only some of their judgments and orders, so a good number of the privacy injunctions we have obtained are not online at all. Six judgments and nine court orders from eight of these matters are on the public record, and the table below links to each of them. If someone is threatening to publish something private about you, start with the privacy injunctions we have obtained and how to get one. If it has already been published, read our guide to breach of privacy law.
Our privacy injunction cases on the court record
Each row is a case in which the High Court protected our client's private information. The court replaced most of the names with initials, so the records show what the judge ordered and who the lawyers were, and nothing that identifies the client.
| Case | What the court did | Court record |
|---|---|---|
| HSX v Persons Unknown and others (2026) | Emergency injunction on a Saturday, continued at the second hearing | Order of 18 July 2026; order of 29 July 2026; judgment [2026] EWHC 1985 (KB) |
| PHJ v UJV (2026) | Injunction with anonymity and reporting restrictions, then a penal notice | Order of 8 July 2026; order of 23 July 2026 |
| RXE v Ryan and others (2026) | Injunction and anonymity order | Order of 30 June 2026 |
| BGR v Persons Unknown (2025) | Injunction and anonymity order against unidentified blackmailers | Order of 21 May 2025 |
| BBG v Persons Unknown (2023 to 2024) | Injunction without notice, continued, then judgment in default with costs of £62,000 | Judgment [2023] EWHC 2355 (KB); order of 20 September 2023; order of 19 October 2023; order of 20 February 2024 |
| GJE and another v SLE (2022) | Injunction continued until trial | Judgment [2022] EWHC 1592 (QB) |
| XLD v KZL (2020) | Injunction against a blackmailer met through a dating website | Judgment [2020] EWHC 1558 (QB) |
| GYH v Persons Unknown (2017 and 2018) | Interim and then final injunction against unidentified publishers | Judgment [2017] EWHC 3360 (QB); judgment [2018] EWHC 121 (QB) |

![Belafonte v News Group Newspapers [2026] EWHC 273 (KB): the High Court decides what The Sun's article meant](/images/videos/the-case-of-stephen-belafonte-v-the-sun-thumbnail.jpg)





























