Defamation and social media expert lawyers. Best defamation solicitor

Internet Law Specialist Lawyers FREE CALL 0800 612 7211

Recently removed from the internet

 

Law Society Awards winners. Cohen Davis

Yair Cohen Lawyer of the Year Award.jpg

What our clients say...
"Have used twice and will use again. "
“Excellent, professional service delivered within a tight timeline. Have used twice and... Read More...
Contact our super friendly Social Media lawyers today!

Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211

 

Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

 
Please use the form below to contact us.
We will respond as soon as possible.

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Or you can call us on our free hotline.

FREEPHONE  0800 612 7211

(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

 

 

Or if you prefer you can email us to helpline (at) CohenDavis.co.uk.

 

TheInternet LawCentre

Domain name and trademark

Misuse of your domain name

Consequences of the misuse of somebody else's domain name

If you purchase a domain name that carries the name of somebody else’s business, you could be ordered to transfer it to the business owners.  People might purchase a domain name that includes the name of another business for various reasons but they shall always be prepared to be ordered to forfeit the domain by WIPO. Misuse of a domain name might take different forms.

Can you buy a domain name which includes another business name

Is it lawful to use another business name to create a critical website

Is there an example of a case where a person was ordered to forfeit a domain name

What are the powers of WIPO in relation to domain names

Can you buy a domain name which includes another business name

You can buy a domain name that includes another business name in order to either use it yourself in the future or simply because you did not realise that the domain name you have purchased includes a name of a business that already exists.

Some people buy a domain name that uses the name of another business, in order to use the domain name to attract internet users to a website. The website could be about a genuine product or service or it could be about another business, which you might want to criticise or review. Occasionally, you have people purchasing domain names with the name of a business they either worked for or had used its services. The prime reason for doing this is to criticise or defame that business. In this case, it is likely that your actions would be considered a misuse of a domain name.

Is it lawful to use another business name to create a critical website

In most cases it would be unlawful to use another business name to create a critical website. It is likely that the business whose name you used in the domain name will be able to successfully sue you for either breach of trademark or for defamation or for both. Inducing people to visit your website because they believe they are visiting the actual website of the company you are criticizing could be considered as passing off, or in other words, as an attempt to capitalise on another business’ good name to benefit yourself.

Driving people to your website is an action that is likely to benefit you, even if you don’t sell anything on that website but only use it to create a campaign or to criticise another business. The business does not need to have a registered trademark for you to commit to passing off. An unregistered trademark is as good in most cases for the business to establish the cause of action of passing off.

Is there an example of a case where a person was ordered to forfeit a domain name

A recent example portraying the misuse of a domain name and where an order to transfer a domain name to the business whose name was part of the domain name was made, is the case of The Inter Continental Hotels Group (IHG).

In that case, a German man who gained control over 1,519 domain names was ordered by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) to release them to a hotel chain. IHG brought the action after it discovered that domain names that corresponded with its brand were being used by Daniel Kirchhof to profit his internet hotel booking business by offering customers the opportunity to book rooms in hotels that were not connected to the IHG group.

IHG argued that by using its intellectual property, Mr Kirchhof was not only benefiting himself but that he was also promoting competitor hotels. The case confirmed two important issues. First, it is acceptable to bundle together more than one dispute against a single person and deal with the lot in one single case, and second, it was not acceptable for someone to simply use another company’s name in domain names that were intended to benefit them financially.

What are the powers of WIPO in relation to domain names

WIPO, is the World Intellectual Property Organization and among the services WIPO provides is a dispute resolution service for challenges filed by trademark owners in relation to abusive registration and use of internet domain names, commonly known as cybersquatting. This entire procedure is conducted online and results in enforceable decisions within two months. It is probably the cheapest and quickest method to have domain names transferred back to the business owners who own the trademark to them.

Often, WIPO will order the transfer of a domain if the owner is able to show that the name is identical or confusingly similar to terms the owner has rights to, the person who owns it has no rights to the domain name, and the name was registered and is being used in bad faith. If you are aware of a third party misusing your trademark by attempting to attract internet users to promote goods and services competitive with yours, or to defame your business, you might be able to stop them from doing so by asking the WIPO for an appropriate ruling by declaring that there has been a misuse of a domain name which warrants a domain name transfer.

 

a flat out uncond

Signature cases

Our work featured on

Latest Articles

Explore this topic!
Our clients speak out
"...always delivers significantly above average with...
"Yair's approach to business is truly unique and refreshing. His dedication to business... Read More...
"They immediately referred us to Cohen Davis in the UK who...
“ We have had highly defamatory comments posted against our company and me, the CEO on... Read More...
"I was delighted to work with Sara on my project"
"I was delighted to work with Sara on my project. Sara demonstrated a unique... Read More...
"I would highly recommend them if you need help with...
"I would like to express my gratitude for the service provided to me by Cohen Davis... Read More...
"...extremely satisfied"
“We have used Cohen Davis to sort out defamation problems for our clients. They have... Read More...
"Have used twice and will use again. "
“Excellent, professional service delivered within a tight timeline. Have used twice and... Read More...

Online defamation