Click HERE to Call Free for immediate help! 0800 612 7211
Every situation is different so by far the best way to find out how to respond to a social media legal issue is to speak to those who are most likely to have dealt with a situation similar to yours.
To find out how you can improve your reputation on the internet simply select one of the easy methods of contacting us.

We will respond as soon as possible.

FREEPHONE 0800 612 7211
(+) 44 207 183 4 123 from outside the UK.

TheInternet LawCentre
Just published!
- Legal help in removing offending TikTok videos
- How to correct misleading search results
- Taking legal action following harassment within the family - case study
- Long-term harassment against an influencer - case study
- How to remove revenge porn from the Internet
- How to remove a video posted by a vigilante group
Social media disclosure

Advice on seeking social media disclosure
Do you need a court order to get disclosure from social media platforms
The UK High Court's approach to granting social media disclosure
What happens after your lawyer obtains disclosure from social media platforms
Can you obtain disclosure orders from social media companies who operate from outside the UK
Do social media platforms co-operate with disclosure order application
Do you need a court order to get disclosure from social media platforms
Yes. Social media disclosure refers to the act of revealing users' personal information to third parties, either intentionally or unintentionally, by social media platforms. This information may include users' full names, email addresses, locations, interests, and browsing habits. Social media disclosure has become an increasingly significant concern in the digital age, as data breaches and privacy violations have become more common. The importance of obtaining social media disclosure through the courts lies in the fact that user's personal information is valuable and, if disclosed without their consent, could be used for malicious purposes. Therefore, it is crucial for social media platforms to ensure that they have robust privacy policies and security measures in place to protect users' personal information from any unauthorised access or disclosure.
The UK High Court's approach to granting social media disclosure
. In the United Kingdom, the justice system has adapted to the rise of social media as a source of evidence in criminal and civil cases. The UK High Court approach to granting social media disclosure starts with a clear understanding of the relevance of the social media content to the case at hand.
The court will consider whether the material is likely to contain admissible evidence, whether it is accessible, and whether the privacy rights of the account holder and other individuals could be affected by disclosure. The court will also weigh the potential harm to the administration of justice if the evidence is not disclosed.
If the court decides that disclosure is necessary, the order will typically require the social media platform to provide access to the relevant data or information. It is important to note that the UK High Court's approach to granting social media disclosure is subject to the ongoing debate and legal challenges as social media continues to evolve and raise new legal questions.
What happens after your lawyer obtains disclosure from social media platforms
After your lawyer obtains disclosure from social media platforms, there are several steps that both you and your legal team should take. The first step is to carefully review and analyse the information that has been obtained. This includes examining any posts, messages, profiles, or other data that has been provided by the social media platforms.
Your lawyer will likely use this information to build a stronger case on your behalf and to develop a strategic legal approach that takes into account the evidence that has been uncovered. It may also be necessary to engage in further investigation or discovery, depending on the nature of the case and the information that has been obtained.
Throughout this process, it is important to work closely with your lawyer to ensure that your legal rights are protected and that your case is handled in a professional and ethical manner.
Can you obtain disclosure orders from social media companies who operate from outside the UK
Yes. you obtaining disclosure orders from social media companies who operate from outside the UK. However, obtaining disclosure orders from social media companies that operate from outside the UK is a complex and challenging process. Social media companies often store data on servers located in multiple countries, making it difficult to determine which country's laws govern the data. Furthermore, many social media companies operate under the laws of their home country, which may not align with UK laws regarding disclosure.
This can create significant legal and jurisdictional complexities when attempting to obtain disclosure orders from social media companies. Additionally, social media companies may be reluctant to share user data due to privacy concerns, even when a valid court order has been obtained. These factors make it imperative to work with an experienced solicitor who can navigate the intricacies of obtaining disclosure orders from social media companies outside the UK.
Do social media platforms co-operate with disclosure order application
Yes. In most cases, social media platforms co-operate with disclosure order applications. In most cases, they agree to co-operate on a voluntary basis which means that you may be excused from making an application to the court to formally serve the disclosure order outside of the jurisdiction.
The co-operation also means that the process of obtaining the disclosure is made cheaper and more affordable as if you can agree on the terms of a disclosure order with a social media platform, the court may excuse the need to have a hearing in person. This, again, helps smooth out the process and reduces the costs of obtaining the disclosure order from the social media platform.
|
Reputation management
- Business defamation on Google
- Defamation by investors on social media
- Disgruntled employees posting defamation
- How to remove a cloned Facebook account
- International online reputation management
- Online reputation attack legal advice
- Online reputation strategies
- Reputation crisis management
- SEO and online reputation management
Our work featured on |
---|
Category of work
Norwich Pharmacal Order
Latest Articles
Porn law
- Cleaning Up the Internet: The Impact and Consequences of Removing Pornographic Videos
- How to remove revenge porn from the Internet
- Is a release form by porn film actor valid
- Privacy injunction to remove a porn video
- Regret over porn film
- Removal of old online adult content case study
- Remove porn films from the internet
- Remove porn images and videos from the internet
- Revenge porn legal advice
- Sexual coercion and pornography
- Terms and conditions for adult platforms
- The case of Mario Rogers - the porn headmaster
Privacy law
- Emergency injunctions
- How to remove a criminal record from Google
- Injunction for breach of privacy
- Is catfishing illegal
- Is it illegal to post Is it illegal to post a private conversation on Facebook
- Is it legal to film someone and upload it to YouTube
- Removal of defamatory video from the internet
- The case of DDF v YYZ
- The escort transgender case for a breach of privacy on adult review website - GYH v Persons Unknown
Right to be forgotten
- A case of a successful ICO right to be forgotten appeal
- Can you remove articles from Google if you were not guilty?
- Case study on removing a conviction from the internet
- Delisting Professional Discipline from Google
- Does a right to be forgotten apply to prison sentence of over 4 years
- Google right to be forgotten
- Help with a right to be forgotten
- How to correct misleading search results
- How to manage online reputation after false allegations
- How to maximise success with a right to be forgotten
- How to remove a video posted by a vigilante group
- How to remove a video posted by a vigilante group
- Legal advice right to be forgotten
- Removal of a professional disciplinary hearing from Google case study
- Removal of google searches worldwide
- Removal of newspaper reports about a court case study
- Remove court records from Google
- Remove newspaper articles for victim of crime case study
- Removing search results under a right to be forgotten
- Right to be forgotten FAQ
- Right to be forgotten ICO appeal
- Right to be forgotten post Brexit
- Right to be forgotten refused
- Take down negative articles from the internet
- Why did Google refuse your right to be forgotten request
Online harassment
- The case of Frankie Rzucek
- The Sweet Bobby case - Kirat Assi v Simran Kaur Bhogal
- The Lindsey Goldrick-Dean v Paul Curran - winning after a decade of harassment
- The case of Phipps v Britton-unmasking internet trolls
- Catfishing defamation case study
- Online harassment legal advice
- Teenage harassment on social media
- Cross jurisdiction case of harassment
- Harassment injunctions
- Social media legal advice for parents
- The case of Rada-Ortiz v Espinosa-Vadillo
- Instagram harassment
- Harassment solicitors no win no fee
- Harassment and defamation on the internet
- Online trolling legal help
- Harassment limitation
- Harassment on social media
- Legal advice for online harassment
- How to stop internet trolling
- Is harassment a crime
- Civil harassment and criminal harassment in the UK what is the difference
- Harassment on Facebook
- Celebrity online harassment
- Harassment of celebrity
- Can you sue someone for exposing you on social media
- How to take legal action for cyberbullying
- What to do if you are being harassed by family
- Professional harassment and threats to disclose private information
- Someone used my video without permission
- Legal action for harassment and stalking
- How to deal with someone who is harassing you
- What to do if someone is blackmailing you - a helpful guide
- Taking legal action following harassment within the family - case study
Online defamation
- Cancel culture defamation
- Chase Levels in defamation cases
- Defamation "meaning" in the case of TJM -v- Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
- Defamation and a job reference
- Defamation by a newspaper journalist from outside the UK
- Defamation by an anonymous internet user
- Defamation by an Ex-Employee
- Defamation by competitors case
- Defamation by disgruntled former employees
- Defamation by employees
- Defamation by innuendo case study
- Defamation cease and desist letter
- Defamation claim against the police
- Defamation injunctions
- Defamation legal advice
- Defamation legal advice - Read before taking legal action
- Defamation on Blogger
- Defamation on Twitter case
- Defamation on websites
- Defamation removal letter
- Defamation solicitors
- Defamation with SEO
- Defamatory out of context news article
- Do you need a lawyer to represent you in a defamation case
- False accusation of rape on social media
- Falsely accused of rape
- First injunction against Google case study
- Google business defamation
- Handling an online reputation attack case study
- How can I remove online defamation
- How can I stop someone from defaming my business
- How to deal with defamatory content on social media
- How to fight back against anonymous defamation
- Interim injunctions in defamation cases
- Internet defamation lawyers
- Internet law in the UK
- Legal action for defamation
- Legal action for libel
- Letter before legal action in defamation
- No win no fee defamation solicitor
- Online Defamation on YouTube
- Publicly listed companies and claims for defamation
- Remove defamation from Google
- Removing defamation from the internet
- Section 13 of the Defamation Act 2013
- The case of Brian Dudley v Michael Phillips - damages for defamation and breach of GDPR
- The case of Paul Britton and Origin Design
- The case of RRR PLC v Gary Carp
- The case of Selvaratnam Suresh v the Met Police
- The case of TJM v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police
- The defamation case - David Paisley vs. Graham Linehan
- The Jack Aaronson (Dominic Ford) v. Marcus Stones (Mickey Taylor) defamation case
- The Stephen Belafonte v Mel B case
- Twitter defamation and harassment
- What can you do if you are falsely accused of sexual assault online
- What to do if someone makes false allegations against you on the internet
- What to do if you are defamed on a scam website
- What to do if you were defamed by the police
- What to do with false allegations of sexual assault on Instagram
|